Deficits in executive functions but not in decision making under risk in individuals with problematic social-network use

نویسندگان

چکیده

The tendency to strive for immediate gratification by neglecting potential negative long-term outcomes characterizes addictive behaviors, such as substance use or gaming disorder. Problematic social-network is currently discussed another behavior, which considered result from an imbalance between affective and cognitive processes, indicated traits increased impulsivity and/or decreased executive functions decision-making abilities. This study investigates the respective in users of Cards Lottery Task (CLT) – a task under risk conditions options contain conflicting at same time. A sample German Spanish participants (N = 290) performed CLT well Modified Card Sorting Test (MCST), Barratt Impulsiveness Scale (BIS), short Internet Addiction specified social-networking (sIAT-SNS), screeners on other potentially problematic behaviors. Comparing extreme groups based sIAT-SNS scores (1SD above/below mean), individuals with (n 56), compared those non-problematic 50), showed attentional reduced functions. No differences were observed performance. findings indicate that related rather than general deficits. Furthermore, likely co-occur Internet-use particularly shopping.

برای دانلود باید عضویت طلایی داشته باشید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Impaired decision-making under risk in individuals with alcohol dependence.

BACKGROUND Alcohol dependence is associated with poor decision-making under ambiguity, that is, when decisions are to be made in the absence of known probabilities of reward and loss. However, little is known regarding decisions made by individuals with alcohol dependence in the context of known probabilities (decision under risk). In this study, we investigated the relative contribution of the...

متن کامل

Trait Anxiety Has Effect on Decision Making under Ambiguity but Not Decision Making under Risk

Previous studies have reported that trait anxiety (TA) affects decision making. However, results remain largely inconsistent across studies. The aim of the current study was to further address the interaction between TA and decision making. 304 subjects without depression from a sample consisting of 642 participants were grouped into high TA (HTA), medium TA (MTA) and low TA (LTA) groups based ...

متن کامل

Role Taking Under Financial Risk Decision Making

This paper explores people’s behavior when they are facing financial risks. Through the setting of an economics experiment, people’s willingness to bear financial risks and their tendency to impose risks on others are investigated. The experiment result shows that most people are risk-neutral or risk-averse when making decision under financial environment, and their tendency to impose risks on ...

متن کامل

analysis of power in the network society

اندیشمندان و صاحب نظران علوم اجتماعی بر این باورند که مرحله تازه ای در تاریخ جوامع بشری اغاز شده است. ویژگیهای این جامعه نو را می توان پدیده هایی از جمله اقتصاد اطلاعاتی جهانی ، هندسه متغیر شبکه ای، فرهنگ مجاز واقعی ، توسعه حیرت انگیز فناوری های دیجیتال، خدمات پیوسته و نیز فشردگی زمان و مکان برشمرد. از سوی دیگر قدرت به عنوان موضوع اصلی علم سیاست جایگاه مهمی در روابط انسانی دارد، قدرت و بازتولید...

15 صفحه اول

Decision making under ambiguity but not under risk is related to problem gambling severity.

The aim of the present study was to examine the relationship between problem gambling severity and decision-making situations that vary in two degrees of uncertainty (probability of outcome is known: decision-making under risk; probability of outcome is unknown: decision-making under ambiguity). For this purpose, we recruited 65 gamblers differing in problem gambling severity and 35 normal cont...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

ژورنال

عنوان ژورنال: Comprehensive Psychiatry

سال: 2021

ISSN: ['0010-440X', '1532-8384']

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comppsych.2021.152228